Likabali Sdo Circle - Lower Siang, Arunachal Pradesh

Likabali Sdo is an administrative circle in the Lower Siang district of Arunachal Pradesh, India. It includes various villages governed through Gram Panchayats and forms part of the district's rural administration.

According to the 2011 Census, the total area of the circle was 341 km². The sex ratio was 934 females per 1,000 males.

List of Villages in Likabali Sdo Circle

Likabali Sdo Circle has a total of 23 villages. The table below includes all villages in the Circle, along with their Gram Panchayat and category details:

Sl. No.Village NameCategoryGram Panchayat
1BaliRuralBali
2DipaRuralDipa-Ii
3GogarRuralJipu
4JipuRuralJipu
5KaneRuralSiji
6KuntorRuralKuntor
7LikaRuralLika
8Likabali Check PostRuralLiru-I
9Likabali H.Q.RuralLiru-Ii
10Lipu LikabaliRuralLipu-Ii
11LiruRuralLiru-Ii
12MagiRuralSiji
13MaliniRuralJipu
14NilokRuralBali
15PaleRuralKuntor
16Pale - 8RuralDipa-Ii
17SijiRuralSiji
18Siji Labour CampRuralSiji
19SilliRuralSilli
20Silli EteRuralSilli
21Silli LicheRuralSilli
22SoiRuralSiji
23Upper Colony LikabaliRuralLipu-I

Population of Likabali Sdo Circle

According to the 2011 Census, Likabali Sdo Circle had a total population of 6,076 people living in 1,205 households. The population comprised 3,142 males and 2,934 females, with an average population density of 18 people per km². The table below provides a rural-urban comparison of these statistics.

CategoryTotalRuralUrban
Total Population6,0766,0760
Male Population3,1423,1420
Female Population2,9342,9340
Total Households1,2051,2050
Population Density18 / km²18 / km²0 / km²

Likabali Sdo Circle had 4,217 literate people and 745 children in the 0–6 age group. The Scheduled Tribe (ST) population was 4,543. The table below presents their rural and urban distribution.

CategoryTotalRuralUrban
Child Population (Age 0–6)7457450
Literate Population4,2174,2170
Illiterate Population1,8591,8590
Scheduled Caste (SC) Population000
Scheduled Tribe (ST) Population4,5434,5430

NOTE: Population and area figures shown here are based on Census 2011. Administrative boundaries may have changed, so the figures may include combined values for areas that were reorganized later.